War on Terrorism…Sometimes

How, can I ask, can we fight a "worldwide war on terrorism" when we are protecting groups whom we say ARE terrorists? Is this possible? I'm sorry, but I can't take this administrations' "global fight against terror" crap seriously when they're doing stuff like this. I don't care if they do see the Iranian regime as their enemy. What happens if we do end up at war with Iran and we do take down the Iranian government…we hand it over to these guys? Terrorists? Didn't we already say we can't hand over a country to the terrorists?

This is how we get into these messes, by supporting groups or countries that are questionable. We may their star rise. If we hadn't poured so much money into the mujahedeen in Pakistan in the 1980's, you think the Taliban would have ever existed or that Al-Qaeda would have the power it had today. We supported people who very clearly stabbed us in the back. What's to think these guys won't stab us in the back either?

Also, there's a double standard here. The State Department listed the MEK as a terrorist organization, meaning no American may deal with it and their assets are frozen, but our own government is protecting them? How can they can protect them, but nobody else can deal with them? The administration can give aid and comfort to these guys, even though they are terrorists, but Pelosi can't go talk to Syria, who, by the way, is NOT isolated from anyone but the US. It's hypocritical and not right.

Seriously, if you want to go to war with Iran Mr. President, just tell us, we'll have you impeached before Memorial Day.